What Working Genius Actually Is

The Six Types of Working Genius is a model developed by Patrick Lencioni and The Table Group. It measures where people find joy and pain in the work itself, from the first question to the finished job. It breaks that work into six steps.

Every person has two of those six that are Genius, where they have excess capacity. Two that are Competency, where they do the job well but it wears. And two that are Frustration, where they become a personal bottleneck.

A traffic signal with the red, amber and green lamps all lit at once.
Red is stop.Frustration. Yellow is yield.Competency. Green is go.Genius.

The Six Types of Work

Ideation through implementation. We all run every one of these, every single day.

Wonder (W)

Asking why things are the way they are. Wonder notices that something could be better before anyone has named what.

Invention (I)

Generating original ideas and solutions. Invention turns the question into something you can actually try.

Discernment (D)

Judging which ideas will work, using instinct and pattern recognition. Discernment separates the promising from the impractical.

Galvanizing (G)

Rallying people to act. Galvanizing builds the momentum that turns a good decision into movement.

Enablement (E)

Supporting people and responding to what is needed, so the work keeps going once it starts.

Tenacity (T)

Driving to completion. Tenacity pushes through obstacles and gets the thing finished to standard.

Where do you find the most joy in your work?

Which part leaves you unnaturally drained if you do it for more than an hour?

Building a Team

Every map starts as one row.

Expected in a group of 6
1.5
1.56
1.86
1.74
2.88
2.4
Geniuses
1
1
1
1
5
3
Competencies
3
2
4
0
0
3
Frustrations
2
3
1
5
1
0
Name
Wonder
Invention
Discernment
Galvanizing
Enablement
Tenacity
OwnerIE-DT-WGThe Adaptable DesignerGenius: Invention, Enablement; Competency: Discernment, Tenacity; Frustration: Wonder, Galvanizing.
IntegratorGD-TW-IEThe Intuitive ActivatorGenius: Discernment, Galvanizing; Competency: Wonder, Tenacity; Frustration: Invention, Enablement.
Member 2ET-WD-IGThe Loyal FinisherGenius: Enablement, Tenacity; Competency: Wonder, Discernment; Frustration: Invention, Galvanizing.
Member 3ET-WI-DGThe Loyal FinisherGenius: Enablement, Tenacity; Competency: Wonder, Invention; Frustration: Discernment, Galvanizing.
Member 4ET-ID-WGThe Loyal FinisherGenius: Enablement, Tenacity; Competency: Invention, Discernment; Frustration: Wonder, Galvanizing.
Member 5WE-DT-IGThe Idealistic SupporterGenius: Wonder, Enablement; Competency: Discernment, Tenacity; Frustration: Invention, Galvanizing.

The same Genius Map a client receives, with the names taken off.

Invention is his genius, and Invention craves freedom. That is most of why he started something of his own. Inside somebody else's rules his ideas had nowhere to go, so he built a place where they did.

Then he hired people who felt like him. Watch the Enablement column: his own genius, five more times. That is the most common mistake a leader makes, and it never feels like one at the time. Good people. The work gets done.

By every outside measure it worked. Clients happy, business profitable, and the owner wrung out by the end of most days while the team waits on a direction that never quite arrives.

The map says why, and it is not about anyone's effort. Two columns have no green anywhere. Discernment has no genius on the team. Galvanizing has no genius and not one competency either: five frustrations in a single column.

Follow one idea through that. It leaves his Invention with everything going for it. At Discernment it runs on a competency instead of a genius, so it slows. At Galvanizing nothing carries it at all.

The idea is never rejected. It runs out of road, and everyone assumes somebody else picked it up.

He never asked for the person the map found. Discernment and Galvanizing, both green, in one person. That row sits second because second is where the work was breaking.

Its Enablement is red, in a column otherwise solid green. Not something to hire around. It is the point: this is the person who says the hard thing a team this supportive never says to itself, so the meeting ends with a decision instead of goodwill.

Now the same idea again. Sharpened instead of slowed, carried instead of dropped, and out to a team that was ready to enable it the whole time.

Nothing about the other five changed. The path through them did.

Where there is a visionary, no relationship in the building matters more than the one with an integrator. That is the connective tissue: how ideas reach the team intact, and how the team gets a direction it can act on.

The Data Nobody Collects

Joy and pain aren't soft. They're chemical, and they run on a longer clock than any interview or training session. What gives energy gets repeated. What costs it gets avoided, quietly, months before anyone says it out loud.

So we ask two questions.

Where do you find joy in your work?

Where do you find pain?

A client once told me that in thirty years, no one had ever asked him that. He isn't unusual. How many people on your team have spent even an hour on this with the person they report to?

A CFO I know walks into companies that have never had real bookkeeping. I asked her how long it takes, in books like that, to find something worth knowing. Five minutes, she said. It jumps off the page.

Not because she is unusually sharp, though she is. Because nobody had ever looked.

Joy and pain are the same. The information is already in your building, in the people who keep volunteering for one kind of work and quietly routing around another. Nobody collects it, so nobody uses it, and five minutes of looking beats another year of guessing.

Why Working Genius and Not Something Else?

Because it measures the cause, not the symptoms. Most assessments describe how a person shows up: how they communicate, how they handle pressure. That is real, and too complicated to route work with. Working Genius goes underneath, to what triggers joy and pain in the work itself. That is what predicts where you will be six months from now.

It is also why I am not the one deciding what is right for your people. Discernment is one of my frustrations. I am not there to be right. I am there to help you see what is possible, and the map turns that from my opinion into your data.

Ready to Find Yours?

Thirty minutes, and it's the easy conversation.

Start the conversation